<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes backs Giuliani</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/28/forbes-backs-giuliani/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/28/forbes-backs-giuliani/</link>
	<description>Political news in the Lower Hudson Valley, New York state.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:36:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/28/forbes-backs-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-12655</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/28/forbes-backs-giuliani/#comment-12655</guid>
		<description>So do away with the AMT. What does a flat tax have to do with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do away with the AMT. What does a flat tax have to do with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the consultant</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/28/forbes-backs-giuliani/comment-page-1/#comment-12451</link>
		<dc:creator>the consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2007/03/28/forbes-backs-giuliani/#comment-12451</guid>
		<description>Rudy is a believer in simplifying the tax code...and
over the next two years as the AMT hits more and more
middle income wage earners that;&#039;s not a bad position to have...do you realize that the AMT was passed in 1969
never indexed for inflation and was aimed at only 222
taxpayers who were not paying taxes based on large
deductions...now it affects about 22,000,000 people
and produces more revenue than the actual tax code itself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy is a believer in simplifying the tax code&#8230;and<br />
over the next two years as the AMT hits more and more<br />
middle income wage earners that;&#8217;s not a bad position to have&#8230;do you realize that the AMT was passed in 1969<br />
never indexed for inflation and was aimed at only 222<br />
taxpayers who were not paying taxes based on large<br />
deductions&#8230;now it affects about 22,000,000 people<br />
and produces more revenue than the actual tax code itself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

