Comments on: Factoids from Democratic presidential candidates

By: the consultant

the consultant — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:54:24 +0000

THE ANSWER IS NONE…THAT’S WHY HILLARY IS GOING
TO BE THE NOMINEE….TOO BAD GORE DIDN’T GET IT
EARLY

By: Jim Kelly - Conservative Campaigns

Jim Kelly - Conservative Campaigns — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:55:26 +0000

RE: Obama

Tell me please…..

Other then the Liberal Media thinking and telling everyone that this guy walks on water….

What has this guy EVER done other the “Street Naming,” “Child Safety Seat Laws,” “Silly feel good Laws” or “Community Park Openings”?????

I mean after all , He was just an Illinois “State” Senator just about two years ago…What possible experience could he have? (LOL)

Jim Kelly – Conservative Campaigns

By: Ethan Edwards

Ethan Edwards — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:19:51 +0000

Maybe Ethan Edwards is really Ethan Edwards.

Or maybe he is the John Wayne character, or maybe
the comic book hero. Or maybe he is all three.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:53:00 +0000

the fact that no leading democrat is willing to commit
to immediate withdrawal means that even they recognize
that you can’t take out 160,000 troops instantaneously
it will take time…that is not to justify the war in the
first place but it does recognize the reality that once
we made the committment in order to withdraw without
jeopardizing the safety of our troops and making
the Iraqi’s more at risk we need to withdraw
safely

By: Walter Barrett

Walter Barrett — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:40:16 +0000

Ethan Edwards was the name of John Wayne’s character is “The Searchers.” It was also the name of a Superman knock-off from Marvel comics.

I’d say this one is the comic book hero…

By: Yonkers Voter

Yonkers Voter — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:16:24 +0000

Who is Ethan Edwards?

By: Ethan Edwards

Ethan Edwards — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:29:21 +0000

How about a “factoid” from last night’s debate
at which Obama, Clinton and Edwards all said
they could NOT guarantee American troops would
be out of Iraq by 2013.

Isn’t that a meaningful “factoid?”

By: the consultant

the consultant — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:24:00 +0000

LOWERING THE DRINKING AGE TO 18 WOULD NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM
THE PROBLEM IS THAT KIDS….UNDERAGE ARE GOING TO DRINK
IT IS A FACT OF TEENAGE LIFE…THE JOB OF PARENTS AND
THE COMMUNITY SHOULD BE TO DISCOURAGE DRINKING BUT
TO MAKE SURE THAT IF A CHILD DECIDES TO DRINK ILLEGALLY
HE DOES NOT GET IN A CAR AND RISK HIS OWN LIFE AS WELL
AS THAT OF OTHERS…. WHEN THE POLIC RAID PRIVATE HOMES
WHERE DRINKING IS GOING ON UNDERAGE…THEY ARE SENDING
TWO MESSAGES…DON;T LET YOUR KIDS DRINK IN YOUR HOUSE
OR YOU WILL BE CRIMINALLY LIABLE..AND THAT TRANSLATES
INTO ..TELL THE KIDS TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE..LIKE THE PARK
WHICH HAS THE MOST LIKLIHOOD OF RESULTING IN A DEATH
FROM A DWI…OUT OF THE HOUSE DRINKING OR IN THE HOUSE DRINKING…..