<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton criticizes Obama&#8217;s comment on Reagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/</link>
	<description>Political news in the Lower Hudson Valley, New York state.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hersey</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-27519</link>
		<dc:creator>Hersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/#comment-27519</guid>
		<description>Hillary: I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t think itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a better idea to shut down the government, to drive us into debt.Ã¢â‚¬â„¢Ã¢â‚¬â„¢

That&#039;s funny - the only one I remember doing that was her hubby &quot; Bubba&quot; (who I actually like) - when  was that? about 96-7??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary: I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t think itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a better idea to shut down the government, to drive us into debt.Ã¢â‚¬â„¢Ã¢â‚¬â„¢</p>
<p>That&#8217;s funny &#8211; the only one I remember doing that was her hubby &#8221; Bubba&#8221; (who I actually like) &#8211; when  was that? about 96-7??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annevilla</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-27482</link>
		<dc:creator>annevilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/#comment-27482</guid>
		<description>FROM &#039;HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT WEBSITE&#039; - PRESS RELEASE 12/12/07

&quot;...She must break recent tradition, cast cronyism aside and fill her cabinet with the best people, not only the best Democrats, but the best Republicans as well.. WeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re confident she will do that. Her list of favorite presidents - Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Truman, George H.W. Bush and Reagan - demonstrates how she thinks...&quot;

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4674

GO OBAMA!

YES WE CAN

Anne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FROM &#8216;HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT WEBSITE&#8217; &#8211; PRESS RELEASE 12/12/07</p>
<p>&#8221;...She must break recent tradition, cast cronyism aside and fill her cabinet with the best people, not only the best Democrats, but the best Republicans as well.. WeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re confident she will do that. Her list of favorite presidents &#8211; Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Truman, George H.W. Bush and Reagan &#8211; demonstrates how she thinks&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4674" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4674</a></p>
<p>GO OBAMA!</p>
<p>YES WE CAN</p>
<p>Anne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Edwards</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-27447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/#comment-27447</guid>
		<description>You guys don&#039;t get it. :)

It isn&#039;t going to be Huckabee, or McCain
or Rudy on the Republican side.  

It will be Romney, and he will beat whichever
clone of George McGovern the Dems put up there.  

Meanwhile, the really important news this weekend
will be in Wisconsin....specifically in Green Bay.

Giants....23-20 as they pull off another big upset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys don&#8217;t get it. :)</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t going to be Huckabee, or McCain<br />
or Rudy on the Republican side.  </p>
<p>It will be Romney, and he will beat whichever<br />
clone of George McGovern the Dems put up there.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, the really important news this weekend<br />
will be in Wisconsin&#8230;.specifically in Green Bay.</p>
<p>Giants&#8230;.23-20 as they pull off another big upset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the consultant</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-27439</link>
		<dc:creator>the consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/#comment-27439</guid>
		<description>so that would leave John McCain!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so that would leave John McCain!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-27435</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/#comment-27435</guid>
		<description>A US PRESIDENT NAME HUSSEIN BARACK OBAMA. THAT&#039;S FOOLISH AND NONSENSE!!!!!!
 
Mrs Clinton is obviously the most qualified candidate in both parties.I&#039;m  an American  I stay up late to watch the debates.So far she is the only candidate that demonstrated the qualites and experience that US needs during these turbulent times.
 
Obama may be brilliant , could make good C and C for the Future but ceratinly not ready for the 2008 White House.U S politics isn&#039;t about looking nice and talking sweet; it&#039;s about tough choices and decisions.Americans have to separate enthusiasm founded on wishes and dreams from pedigree, know-how, and a demonstrated capacity to deliver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A US PRESIDENT NAME HUSSEIN BARACK OBAMA. THAT&#8217;S FOOLISH AND NONSENSE!!!!!!</p>
<p>Mrs Clinton is obviously the most qualified candidate in both parties.I&#8217;m  an American  I stay up late to watch the debates.So far she is the only candidate that demonstrated the qualites and experience that US needs during these turbulent times.</p>
<p>Obama may be brilliant , could make good C and C for the Future but ceratinly not ready for the 2008 White House.U S politics isn&#8217;t about looking nice and talking sweet; it&#8217;s about tough choices and decisions.Americans have to separate enthusiasm founded on wishes and dreams from pedigree, know-how, and a demonstrated capacity to deliver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PulSamsara</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-27427</link>
		<dc:creator>PulSamsara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/#comment-27427</guid>
		<description>Barack Obama is 100% Correct.

Who are the defenders of the status quo ? Is that you ?
Reagan did spawn a &#039;sea change&#039; in American politics.
Obama hopes to spawn a new &#039;sea change&#039;. Change based on the ideals of unity - not division (and certainly not modeled after Reagan&#039;s ideas)
How can anyone look at the state of modern politics and the outlook for our country guided by our current stautus quo - how can this &#039;sea change&#039; of unified working government not make sense.
Anyone who has paid any attention knows what Obama is speaking of about the Republican Party being guided by &#039;ideas&#039; for the past 15 years... you don&#039;t have to subscribe to those ideas but they are, none the less, ideas. The same could be said of the Democratic party of the late 50&#039;s and into the 60&#039;s - Kennedy Idealism. Both of these movements ran their course and were watered down by time. That explains the state of the Democratic Party in the 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s. It also explains the &#039;washed out&#039; state of the Republican Party today.
--- Why do &#039;we&#039; resent being talked to as if we had the capacity for knowledge. That is how Barack Obama is speaking to America... as if &#039;we can&#039; understand. Why would we sell ourselves short and believe that we are past our zenith... that we are a declining people. Come on people... Now is the time to show some strength of character.

Hillary Clinton should do her part in making the Democratic Party a party of ideas again. She can start by voting for Barack Obama in November.

Barack Obama for President of the UNITED States of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama is 100% Correct.</p>
<p>Who are the defenders of the status quo ? Is that you ?<br />
Reagan did spawn a &#8216;sea change&#8217; in American politics.<br />
Obama hopes to spawn a new &#8216;sea change&#8217;. Change based on the ideals of unity &#8211; not division (and certainly not modeled after Reagan&#8217;s ideas)<br />
How can anyone look at the state of modern politics and the outlook for our country guided by our current stautus quo &#8211; how can this &#8216;sea change&#8217; of unified working government not make sense.<br />
Anyone who has paid any attention knows what Obama is speaking of about the Republican Party being guided by &#8216;ideas&#8217; for the past 15 years&#8230; you don&#8217;t have to subscribe to those ideas but they are, none the less, ideas. The same could be said of the Democratic party of the late 50&#8217;s and into the 60&#8217;s &#8211; Kennedy Idealism. Both of these movements ran their course and were watered down by time. That explains the state of the Democratic Party in the 70&#8217;s and 80&#8217;s. It also explains the &#8216;washed out&#8217; state of the Republican Party today.&#8212;- Why do &#8216;we&#8217; resent being talked to as if we had the capacity for knowledge. That is how Barack Obama is speaking to America&#8230; as if &#8216;we can&#8217; understand. Why would we sell ourselves short and believe that we are past our zenith&#8230; that we are a declining people. Come on people&#8230; Now is the time to show some strength of character.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton should do her part in making the Democratic Party a party of ideas again. She can start by voting for Barack Obama in November.</p>
<p>Barack Obama for President of the UNITED States of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the consultant</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-27411</link>
		<dc:creator>the consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/01/18/clinton-criticizes-obmas-comment-on-reagan/#comment-27411</guid>
		<description>that is not what obama said..he said that reagan not
republicans changed the trajectory of the country
ie it was a change election...and that is true whether
or not you agree with republican policies since then
Reagan embraced supply side economics, cutting marginal
tax rates to increase productivity..it worked..
Reagan chose to confront the Soviet Union..MR Gorbachov
Tear that wall down..and down it came....He was a President
with a vision for AMerica...which is what Obama is trying
to convey...that he has a vision albeit not based on the
same concepts either economically or in terms of foreign policy that Reagan&#039;s Presidency was based..However Hillary&#039;s
criticism is an attempt to tie Obama to Republican ideas
not exactly possible given his statements on the issue
and it is a clear indication that his change message
is resonating with democrats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is not what obama said..he said that reagan not<br />
republicans changed the trajectory of the country<br />
ie it was a change election&#8230;and that is true whether<br />
or not you agree with republican policies since then<br />
Reagan embraced supply side economics, cutting marginal<br />
tax rates to increase productivity..it worked..<br />
Reagan chose to confront the Soviet Union..MR Gorbachov<br />
Tear that wall down..and down it came&#8230;.He was a President<br />
with a vision for AMerica&#8230;which is what Obama is trying<br />
to convey&#8230;that he has a vision albeit not based on the<br />
same concepts either economically or in terms of foreign policy that Reagan&#8217;s Presidency was based..However Hillary&#8217;s<br />
criticism is an attempt to tie Obama to Republican ideas<br />
not exactly possible given his statements on the issue<br />
and it is a clear indication that his change message<br />
is resonating with democrats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

