Comments on: Giulinai defeat bad news for Spano

By: Ethan Edwards

Ethan Edwards — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:13:30 +0000

Desi, You were pretty good on those congas.
But beating the drums for Nick Spano is another matter.

I don’t like the Spanos, and I don’t like Cousins, either.

It’s too bad the choices are so poor. But that’s the
way it is throughout politics these days. The lesser of
two evils is not a pleasant choice to have to make.

By: Desi

Desi — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:10:00 +0000

Ethan-you know what the good fight is-its a phrased used by conservatives as an excuse for losing-Nick Spano delivered for the people of his district-more than I can say for Cousins-he is the voice the people of the 35th Senate district need in Albany-because we dont have one now-sounds to me like your a Spano basher-wonder what you have ever done politically-if you using the good fight line-obviously winning is something that has eluded you.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:47:02 +0000

what the reporter should not be doing is rendering an opinion on whether Nick Spano has a better chance of
winning with Rudy than with Mc Cain..that remains to
be seen..it depends on lots of things not just who
is nominated..It also depends on Elliot Spitzers
standing come election time…In any event it is
way too early to assess the prospects of nick
spano based on Rudy dropping out

By: Maryli

Maryli — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:26:04 +0000

Let me second the notion that reporters should not be anointing Hillary president. With Edwards dropping out, I think that Obama has an even better chance of winning. Despite what we are being told to do by the media.

By: Saul W.

Saul W. — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:20:02 +0000

This has got to be one of the more laughable attempts at political prognostication attempted in this blog.

By: pinochio

pinochio — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:42:39 +0000

Giulinai … who is this candidate anyway?

By: Ethan Edwards

Ethan Edwards — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:12:57 +0000

First of all, I think it’s a bit premature
to “anoint” Hillary…err…Billary.

Secondly, does this mean Nick Spano wouldn’t
run again only because he might lose? You
mean his “ideals” won’t push him forward to
carry on the good fight? That was sarcastic.

The Spanos are only about the Spanos, and
always have been.