Comments on: A challenger for the Westchester DA

By: dana marie regans mother

dana marie regans mother — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:28:59 +0000

HEY THIS IS TO THE CONSULTANT WHY DONT YOU INVESTIGATE JANET DEFIORE….PLEASE AND IF YOU WANT SOME INFO AND I MEAN THE REAL DEAL YOU CAN CONTACT ME…NO PROBLEM! I HAVE DEALT WITH ALL OF THEM AND I AM SICK AND TIRED OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO DEFEND WITHOUT BEING THERE,,, SOMEONE LIKE YOU PROPABLY HAS AN INSIDE TO THERE POCKETS SO I GUESS YOU WILL NEVER HAVE ANY PROBLEMS>>>>HOW MUCH DID IT COST YOU AND WHAT ARE THEY PAYING YOU TO SIT BEHIND YOUR COMPUTER AND TALK THE BS YOUR TALKING!!! I LIVED IT AND STILL LIVING IT AND I HAVE WHAT I NEED NOW TO PUBLISH IT SO WATCH FOR ME…

By: dana marie regans mother

dana marie regans mother — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:22:18 +0000

Janet Defiore left the murderers of my 12 year old daughter dana marie regan on the street to kill again. She is so corrupt and a liar. Her ADA office in Yonkers and the CITY COUNCIL of Yonkers BRIBED ME AND I HAVE THE PROOF. tHEY DONT CARE ABOUT THE CHILDREN OF WESTCHESTER OR THE FAMILIES OF WESTCHESTER.PLEASE LET HER NO WHAT WE THINK ABOUT HER!!!! SHE RAN FROM OUR CAMERAS AND HIDE BEHIND THE POLICE WHEN WE TRIED TO QUESTION HER AND WE HAVE THAT ON TAPE. PLEASE DONT LOOK TO HER OFFICE FOR HELP IN YOUR TIME OF NEED YOU WILL NOT GET IT. THE ONLY THING THAT YOU GET FROM HER AND HER CRONIES IS THE RUNAROUND!!!!!

By: Break Your TV

Break Your TV — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:06:19 +0000

Judge Judy? This is the criterion you set? How about Daffy Duck or Alfred E. Neuman?

By: Doreen Kreiss

Doreen Kreiss — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:45:16 +0000

PLEASE GET HER OFF THE TV. SHE’S SO ANNOYING!!!!!!!!!!
SHE’S NO JUDGE JUDY…BELIEVE ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: ed1

ed1 — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:53:45 +0000

Andy Spano is the problem, (along with Ryan and most of his board) , not DiFiore. I don’t like her Party flip-flop, but the DA prosecutes felons and knows well all the players on both sides of the aisle, probably a net advantage to all at the end of the day. The County Exec and the Board Chairman negatively affect everyone trying to make an honest living and stay up with their mortgage payments and outrageous tax bills.

By: jeffrey

jeffrey — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:41:30 +0000

not to mention the faulty logic..if you wan’t to talk
about control why don’t you address the control
that sam zherka has over his pawn tony castro..please
explain to all of us, how castro could file he only
had four thousand dollars in his campaign and then
turn around and buy 20,000 worth of tv spots, and do
two county mailings in the next few days..did he
withold the checks so the public couldn’t see who
his contributors were? or did he get a large infusion
from a single donor immediately after the filing.
and if he did what was the name of that donor..
and remember eventually we will all find out

By: Ivy

Ivy — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:01:14 +0000

We don’t all have Ivy League educations which is obvious from the disjointed prose and faulty sentence structure shouldering its clumsy way into the preceding post.

By: help the better

help the better — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:22:14 +0000

we are a people of principle in Westhchester. Some of the finest in the world. How is it that we can be controlled unwittingly by the current district attorney without pause ??
Our ivy league educations and working class ethics never prepared us for this one.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:55:44 +0000

I want those who think the zherka lawsuit has any validity
to document the issues
1. what is the connection between the bloggers and th
new york da..he has said in an affidavit that there
is no prior relationship of any kind ie there can
be no conspiracy
2. the zherka lawsuit says that he is under grand jury
investigation..why and what for..the new york county
da can only investigate crimes in new york not in
westchester..what is it that zherka may have done
to ignite a grand jury inquiry?
3. the zherka lawsuit states the consultant referred
to him as an albanian mobster..but every single
blog entry from the dates he referenced have absolutely
no entry of that kind ….who made it up…why
did they make it up…and isn’t it libel per se for
them to give out to the press prior to filing the
lawsuit …their allegation that the consultant called
him “an albanian mobster” when in fact no such
statement was ever made
how much should zherka pay for that insult and for
that slander of an attorney who has many clients
from the muslim community

By: the consultant

the consultant — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:00:15 +0000

I can read but sam zherka can’t…you may not like me
but thats too bad…the facts will determine the outcome
and I know what the facts are..you don’t …you think
that everyone who is in public office is corrupt…
they are not…most try to do a good job…some are
greedier than others….some like power….and some
are probably corrupt…but I have never worked for
anyone i thougth to be corrupt…so don’t be quick
to charge corruption…sam zherka is under investigation
and it is from an independent law enforcement agency
Are they also corrupt…no ..the writing on the wall
is that the guardian newspaper is finished…it will
be exposed for what it is…a political newspaper with
a political agenda…a newspaper whose owner spends money
to support candidates….a newspaper whose editor runs
campaigns…for guys like tony castro …what do you
think he gains from it…I will tell you what..ever read
his garbage conspiracy theories..you think it would be
healthy for him to control a da….THe facts are pretty
clear..read the affidavit of the assistant DA from new
york…that will tell you all you have to know about
the zherka allegations….

By: kaye

kaye — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:44:29 +0000

Mike Edelman is already speaking as if he has won the law suit lodged against him by the Westchester Guardian. Mike think twice. Be prepared to pay the price when you lose.

The people in Westchester County are fed up with you and and all the ordinary losers that have been in the corrupt game of politics in this county for so long. Dont you read the writing on the wall you idiot.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:28:08 +0000

Castro doesn’t get it…never did…Blassberg’s reputation
and conduct during the election made it clear to everyone
watching that castro didn’t have the judgment to be the
DA…you watch..after the zherka lawsuit is litigated
castro will be farther and farther away from his goal
because of his relationship to blassberg and zherka..
that will be a central issue from which he will not
escape….just like he couldn’t escape from his
role in the Bronx DA’s office…

By: ed

ed — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:06:56 +0000

I think my grandmother would have absolutely no problem capturing this office, were she an American citizen.

Reggie Thatcher

By: Wahoo

Wahoo — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:23:16 +0000

Your grandmother could win over Tony Castro. He is so tied in with Zherka and Blassberg that he would be wiped out. Castro is over and done. Maybe they could try to run Fidel Castro. He wouldn’t do much worse than Tony Castro.

By: Floppy

Floppy — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:24:49 +0000

Maybe the consultant is right, but that would mean a primary for DA DiFiore. I think she could win over tony castro. I think people are upset by the fact she changed parties and not just seeked the Democratic line in 2009. It seems She already has Independence line.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 02:12:42 +0000

these are all attempts by tony castro and his supporters
to gin up for his primary challenge…he is a loser
not once but twice…and he will lose again….

By: Sago Lady

Sago Lady — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:33:41 +0000

All these replies to an old article.

By: sue swanson

sue swanson — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:01:54 +0000

If Janet is sooo gooood why did she change parties?????
Alot of people help Janet DiFiore,especially the Republicans.
One thing most people have to remember, maybe there isn’t any Republican or Democratic way to fight crime, but a person that flip flops and uses the parties to her or his advantage should be suspect!!!! I am also surprised at Tim Hayes, Mister bleed Republican, defending Janet. Did he defend Mike Spano. My eight ball says doubtful!!!!

By: brett

brett — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:04:54 +0000

Janet Difiore should publish a book on “HoW to cheat and not get caught” or ” fool the people more than once”
She is an expert on both, it might be a best seller with people of he caliber.

By: brett

brett — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:58:16 +0000

I happen to agree with the above poster. Janet Difiore and Jenine Pirro are both bad news. The interesting thing with Janet is that the entire office, other than a hand picked few, are fed up with and dis like this woman. The morral has never been worse in the DA’s office. She is not a leader, she lies alot and also takes advise from idiots such as Sir George and Pat Murphy. We as a people must be the dumbest of all to elect such a failure and untrustworthy woman into the most important office in the county. As far as the poster who mentioned her being a cheat, that has been the rumor in political cirlces for years. How do you explain her staying at Peter Viviano’s house in white plains. Dennis Glazer is either too dumb or Janet Difiore is just that good of a liar and manipulator, either way she must go!

By: JUST SAY NO

JUST SAY NO — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:28:53 +0000

WESTCHESTER HAS A HISTORY OF CORRUPT DA’S WITH CORRUPT HUSBANDS. PIRRO, COULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED FOR TAX EVASION. HER HUSBAND WENT TO JAIL. DIFIORE’S HUSBAND HAS DONE MANY BORDERLINE THINGS TO FURTHER HER CAREER. SHE IS CORRUPT AND HER CONSULTANT IS A COMPLETE FRONTRUNNER, WHO WILL DEFEND ANYONE WHO MIGHT BE OF USE TO HIM LATER ON.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:52:27 +0000

there is always someone somewhere that thinks whoever is
the DA is corrupt…It very often has to do with a bad
experience that the person had but there are just some
people who have a thing against law enforcement officials
be they police or prosecutors…I get really tired of
hearing about “corruption” in the DA’s office…I heard
about it when Carl Vergari was DA..not true…I heard
about it when Jeanine Pirro was DA..not true…and now
we are hearing about it while Difiore is DA…also not
true…Westchester has a history of having competent
professional DA’s and that simply is not going to change
Residents of the county recognize that their Chief Law
Enforcement Officers over the years have acted in their
best interests to protect them against crime and to
help them if they are victims of a criminal act..
allegation of generalized corruption are made usually
out of anger, frustration or jealousy not out of facts
and knowledge ….and that has always been the case

By: L. mack

L. mack — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:32:46 +0000

Janet Difiore in my opinion is by far the most corrupt DA ever elected in Westchester County. This woman is a liar, has no respect for the Constitutional rights of others, a total failure! She has allowed the corruption to flourish in this county. The theft that goes on from Yonkers to the County Governments is staggering. How can we trust a woman who for one cheats on her husband and arranges for a high paying tax funded no show job for her boy friend Peter Viviano. If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem.

By: Sandy

Sandy — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:03:46 +0000

I don’t know why more people aren’t upset about the DiFiore switch. Someone who owes her entire career to the Republican Party simply abandons it for no other reason than her concern over voter demographics and party registration turning Democrat in Westchester. Maybe there is no “Republican or Democratic way to fight crime”, but I think the DA should have conviction. I can’t wait to see what Mr. Schorr does.

By: NewWatcher

NewWatcher — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:14:02 +0000

Look at the inside of the DA’s Office before your blindly drink the happy cool-aid juice for Janet DeFiore. Why in the past three years since she has been in office that she is failing to retain experienced, bright prosecutors and staff members that have spent years of thier lives working within the office? Could it be that moral is at an all time LOW. Westchester County residents wake up and start looking for the truth. Not one Organized Crime conviction in three years….hum.

By: NewWatcher

NewWatcher — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:13:14 +0000

By: Ignatz

Ignatz — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:49:18 +0000

DiFiore will beat this guy, period.

By the way, when Republicans were winning every single office ever in Westchester, when they held a political patronage machine that included Keeler at Playland, and Ed Brady running the County Board, were the voters Republican sheep then?

Obviously, when Republicans win, they have an informed voter. But Democrats voters are sheep? What baloney.

I remember Republican leaders in White Plains blasting Democratic Governors every chance the got. Once a Republican Governor came in – silence.

You’re watching the normal partisanship of two parties – nothing more or less. It’s distasteful to me when Dems do it, but the Reps do it, too.

Let’s stop glorifying one side because you like their ideology and villifying the other.

By: WaltTrombone

WaltTrombone — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:41:17 +0000

Maybe the GOP can find a former Democrat to run, if only just for the irony of it.

DiFiore seems to be at least as competent as Pirro was, with the exception of not sticking herself in front of any available camera at the drop of a hat.

By: Tim Hays

Tim Hays — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:01:20 +0000

Janet DiFiore is a superior public prosecutor, an exemplary District Attorney. If you ask police officials and personnel who have known her for years, you will find they admire and respect Janet—as both a prosecutor, and as a judge.

I helped in Janet DiFiore’s campaign in 2005, and worked also for her in 2002, when she was elected to State Supreme Court. I admire Janet DiFiore greatly.

Now: the political dynamic in Westchester, and Rockland, too, has changed so greatly that one could be the greatest prosecutor in the history of the free world—above reproach, sterling in the administration of the law, accurate in its prosecution—and still be at the whim of some truly ignorant voters. Case in point: the angry, alienated, immature, psychotic members of the modern Democrat Party who sheepishly threw an outstanding man out of the Rockland DA’s office last year, owing to a deal made by our corrupt governor, “Private School” Eliot Spitzer, at the last minute.

Surely, Ms. DiFiore must have taken this zeitgeist factor into account when she switched parties last year, knowing that the ugly, control-oriented, psychotic Democrats who have moved to Westchester from their historically corrupted Brooklyn and Riverdale schesis might seek her head in the next election, had she remained a Republican.

It will be interesting to see what Mr. Schorr has to offer.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:24:51 +0000

as an observer of district attorney’s races since
1973 and having run the races as consultant about
5 times, I can tell you that the incumbant DA from
whatever party has the advantage every single time.
Even Jeanine Pirro whose husband was convicted of
tax fraud and went to jail won while the registration
was against her..Mrs Di Fiore conducts herself in
a fair and impartial manner and notwithstanding the
fact that I am sure Mr Schor was a fine assistant
prosecutor remember what Frank Hogan said.”THere is no
REpublican or Democratic way to fight crime”
Mrs Di Fiore should win this race easily. In fact
Republicans might be smart to consider a cross endorsement
if they have any expectation of winning the other offices
that will be up that year