lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Bruno’s Responsed To Troopergate Report

March
28

“The report released today by the Albany County District Attorney’s Office confirms what I have been saying all along, that former Governor Eliot Spitzer lied to the people of this State about his direct knowledge and involvement in the Troopergate scandal; that he was obsessed with conducting a ‘political hit job’ to damage me personally and politically; and that the administration enlisted favored members of the news media, principally the Albany Times Union to carry out their plot.

“The report represents a turnaround from the District Attorney’s report issued last September that cleared the Governor of any wrongdoing.

“That report was done after a so-called “investigation” in which the DA did not place anyone under oath and was clearly issued as cover for then-Governor Spitzer and his administration”.

“I feel it was a serious mistake not to present this information to a grand jury and proceed with a prosecution, as there is clearly evidence of criminal conduct.

“I urge Governor Paterson to take appropriate action against those involved in the plot and cover-up, and who should not continue to represent him and the Executive Chamber.

“This scandal was a blatant abuse of government power.  This time it was aimed at me.  However, these abuses should present a concern to all New Yorkers.  It also illustrates the importance of having checks and balances in State government and avoiding one-party rule and power.

“While we will continue to move forward with measures to address some of the legislative issues raised by this scandal, this report sheds more light on a sad and disgraceful chapter in New York State history and on a Governor who clearly had his priorities wrong and, as I said so often, lacked the temperament to govern.”

This entry was posted on Friday, March 28th, 2008 at 6:08 pm by Joseph Spector.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Share and Enjoy: del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Google StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! | Print This | Email This Email This

Advertisement

24 Responses to “Bruno’s Responsed To Troopergate Report”

  1. Paul Revere

    Joe Bruno is not a saint. But he is 100 percent right on this one. Mr. Soares also needs to be replaced. All he did was carry water for Spitzer for months. He was part of the cover up too.

  2. ed

    Don’t tell me this is Saint JOSEPH? If so, I’d like to see if he paid for that night at the Inn with his own money. And if he did, where did he get the money? Anybody see the frankincense and myrrh? It was here a minute ago. I think I saw Rabbi Silver wander through the stable. Everybody empty your togas!

  3. NoKoolAidThanks

    Governor Patterson needs some serious credabilty right now. He should demand the resignation of all those Spitzer people involved in this matter. Period.

  4. MS

    I wholeheartedly agree with No Koolaid. and tho Bruno is no Saint, it sure did seem that some people were writing him off as crazy when he was yelling about spitzer trying to bury him. too many people thought ole spitzer was a saint. it’s just too bad that his eviction from office is going to ensure to perjury charge. eliot spitzer belongs in jail writing to jeaning pirro and begging for stamps and porn. failing the ability to really penalize spizter, the vindication i seek will come from seeing all of his peeps expelled from albany.

  5. Paul Revere

    There should be an investigation of Soares, the DA in Albany. Soares did everything he could to make this go away for Spitzer.

  6. the consultant

    you are correct..soares should be superceded under ny
    state law..when the da doesnt do his job

  7. Tim Hays

    I am going to 9 o’clock Mass tomorrow Sunday, and I hope never to be self-righteous. I pray for forgiveness for all the slights I perform on others, whether intentional or not.

    But—forgive me—I am delighted at the knife that is being stuck into Eliot Spitzer’s Draculian heart. He tried to destroy a friend of mine last year in Rockland County, only because Spitzer wanted to eviscerate the Republican Party in New York. He succeeded in taking out the chief law enforcement officer, Michael Bongiorno, in the District Attorney’s race.

    This man Spitzer—for whom I voted in 1998 in his second run for Attorney General, naively thinking he was ethical—is the most supreme disappointment in American electoral history. He may match James Buchanan, the worst president in our history. (Buchanan, another Democrat, caused the Civil War.)

    Never trust a “liberal”—I learned that term 30 years ago. It is a contradiction in terms. DP Moynihan, Hubert Humphrey, Jerry Brown, Paul Simon—they were true liberals. Honest intellectuals, with America’s best interests at heart. The modern day “wanna-be” liberals: Hillary, Spitzer, Schumer—are egomaniacal, corrupted slimebags, dirty people—with no honesty and little integrity, and America’s interests (and citizens) are the least important part of their continuing charade in a meglomaniacal quest for power.

    Makes me wish for Jerry Brown to be in the race for president. At least he was an honest human being, with good moral character

    Tim Hays
    Historian
    Westchester Republican Party

  8. ed

    Uh, Tim, I hope you’re not going to the 9 o’clock at Our Lady of Sorrows. The news there might test your good patience.

  9. Tim Hays

    Hi Ed—no, St. Matthew RC in Hastings. It was a joyous Mass this a.m.

  10. Paul Revere

    Today’s NY Daily News and Fred Dicker in the Post both go after Soares in a big way. Michael Goodwin’s column, the one in the news section of the Daily News, also addresses it. His other column, op-ed, goes after Obama.

    The News also has another article about particular “earmarks”—pork—that Paterson steered to people or organizations very close to him. It raises more questions. It is taxpayer money. Paterson’s troubles continue to mount, and so do Soares.’

  11. Tim Hays

    Thank you “Paul Revere”—“One Party” rule is the most dangerous threat to our Democracy. Fred Dicker tells it as it is, and he has the contacts to support his great columns.

    Once upon a time, The Times Union was a great newspaper. It hasn’t been such in some years, ever since columnist/managing editor Dan Lynch left it, in 2000. That the TU is cozy with local elected officials (where it once exposed them, and helped them to earn deserved prison terms) is disheartening.

    Why didn’t Spitz vet Paterson more carefully in 2006? Because he knew he would cruise to victory over John Faso, the decent and honorable guy who was his opponent, after 12 years of GOP rule of the statehouse.

    The egomaniacs who seek high elective office in New York nowadays are complete slimebags, with the exception of John Faso, who lost to two corrupt humans in consecutive statewide races.

    We do not get the Nelson Rockefellers, or Louis Lefkowitzes, or even (pardon me) the Mario Cuomos or Stan Lundines any more. Dishonest, corrupt people are the major candidates for statewide office.

    I humbly suggest this: for the Democrats, Andrew Cuomo is reviving the concept of dignity in elected officials (disclosure: I voted for Jeanine). I’m liking Cuomo, for now. We Republicans need a candidate above reproach, who can demonstrate his or her virtue to voters, or our state is going to be in trouble for some time.

    I mean, Dan Rostenkowski was an “honest official” compared to the Democrats who run New York today.

  12. MS

    We are delaying the inevitable as the trickle of unethical atcions comes out against Paterson. He was Eliot’s lt. governor. Enough said. He needs to go.

    He’s so swarmy and charming.
    Things to beware of.

    And forgive me too as Eliot’s fall has made me smile ten times a day ever since the news broke. Random, wide faced grins. Occasional cackles.

  13. the consultant

    Let’s talk abit about presidential politics.today for the
    first time I heard Andrea Mitchell actually say what
    I have been saying only to a much wider audience..Obama
    is the weaker of the two democrats because of his connection
    to the reverend wright which will continue to haunt his
    campaign should he be the nominee…the statements made
    by wright will hurt him badly with lunchbox democrats
    those making under 40,000 with high school educations
    who when they see the anti american, seditionist
    rantings of this reverend will not accept the explanation
    from Obama that he did not know what the reverend was
    saying for 20 years..it just doesn’t wash
    In addition, the states that a democrat must win to
    be president..MUST WIN…fla, ohio, new jersey, pa
    and cal…have substantial jewish and Italian democratic voters who are absolutely apopletic with what Wright has said both about Italians but particularly for the jewish
    democrats about Jews and Israel..He embraced and
    honored reverend Farakhan who called judiasm a gutter
    religion..Wright said that what Israel has done to the
    Palestinians is worse than what hitler did to the jews
    No candidate in the history of this nation has conserted
    with or befriended a person so publicly that has uttered
    those kinds of words aimed at those particular constituencies…and they vote…90% of american
    jews go to the polls…and in close races if they
    are democrats and vote for McCain..as they did for
    reagan…the republican wins
    I invite you to examine the site REALPOLITICS.com
    it has all the recent polling date from all the
    states and national polls..forget the national
    stuff ..its irrelevant but look at the differences
    between McCain Obama and Mc Cain Clinton in the
    swing states I have mentioned and therein lies
    the huge problem for the super delegates…Picking
    Obama may be the only way the democrats lose the general
    He makes Jewish voters nervous about Israel and for that
    reason they will take their cue from the fact that Joe
    Lieberman is appended to McCain at the hip…There is
    only one reason for that ..Joe is an orthodox Jew
    and he will be sending a signal to all those democrats
    in florida, and new jersey and california ..older voters
    retirees that Obama is too risky….and it has nothing
    to do with race.because under normal circumstances those
    voters would be his natural constituency..but it has
    everything to do with his failure to condemn a virulently
    anti semitic minister who has been using jews and Israel
    as a punching bag for years….many of those voters
    have family that were murdered by a guy doing the same thing
    in europe in the 20’s…they will be reminded over and over
    again by republican commercials and by snippets of the
    reverend now seen on U tube…and they will vote for
    the Republican..

  14. Talulah

    regarding obama-
    here are some quotes directly from him that YOU should consider. And ever so sadly, it’s too late for too many who cast the wrong vote already.

    This is from “Audacity of Hope”;
    “There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs,” he wrote. “It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.”

    From “Dreams”;
    “The emotion between the races could never be pure,” “Even love was tarnished by the desire to find in the other some element that was missing in ourselves. Whether we sought out our demons or salvation, the other race would always remain just that: menacing, alien, and apart.”

    “There was something about him that made me wary,” Obama wrote. “A little too sure of himself, maybe. And white”

    I could go on and on. But it’s late.
    I don’t know how many people got Obama wrong, when I called him from the get go. Just like I called Spitzer, and even Sall.

  15. the consultant

    his colleger feelings don’t bother me a bit as the child
    of a white mother and black father he was searching for his
    real identity….what bothers me is that after he goes
    to harvard and princeton, after he knows exactly who is
    his, after he becomes law review editor and while he is
    running for the presidency of the united states his choice
    of mentors/pastors is so shockingly bad

  16. WaltTrombone

    Is that all you’ve got against him, Mike? Sure seems that way, because that’s all you keep bringing up.

    If you want to play by Republican rules, one of the cardinal sins of politics is the dreaded “flip-flop.” For your edification and amusement, here’s a handy list, courtesy of the Carpetbagger Report blog, of the many flip-flops of John McBush, I mean, McCain…

    • McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain if he were a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”
    • McCain’s campaign unveiled a Social Security policy that the senator would implement if elected, which did not include a Bush-like privatization scheme. In March 2008, McCain denounced his own campaign’s policy.
    • In February 2008, McCain abandoned his opposition to waterboarding.
    • In November 2007, McCain reversed his previous position on a long-term presence for U.S. troops in Iraq, arguing that the “nature of the society in Iraq” and the “religious aspects” of the country make it inevitable that the United States “eventually withdraws.” Two months later, McCain reversed back, saying he’s prepared to leave U.S. troops in Iraq for 100 years.
    • McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.
    • McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. Now he’s against it.
    • On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own legislation.
    • In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.
    • McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”
    • McCain said he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”
    • McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.
    • McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.
    • McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.
    • McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.
    • On a related note, he said 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and insisted he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.
    • In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.
    • McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.
    • McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.
    • McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.
    • McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.
    • McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.
    • McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.’” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.”

    Please note that the greatest majority of these flip-flops have happened after McCain declared for the 2008 race. So, he’s not only a world class flip-flopper, he’s an opportunistic hypocrite.

  17. Talulah

    But none of this matters. Hilary is going to lose to Obama. Obama is going to go forward to the general and America is going to vote for McCain. I just hope he choses a good Veep because I doubt McCain’s ticker is going to hold out for much longer. Yes, the next president of the US will ultimely be McCain’s vice president.

    Oh what a tangled web we weave when the liberal media does conspire to deceive.

  18. the consultant

    hey Walt you certainly have the issues down but
    this election will be about confidence in the president…
    If obama can pass that test he may be elected…if not
    McCain will be the president…

  19. Anonymous

    The Consultant’s law partner http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/nyregion/30lawyers.html?_r=1&sq=napoli&st=cse&scp=1&pagewanted=print

  20. the consultant

    somone has to do something about the albany county
    da..he was clearly not doing his job in the first
    part of this investigation..and confidence in his
    ability to finish it properly has been badly shaken.
    He should be superseded by the governor with a special
    proscutor

  21. Wahoo

    Yes, that’s right. Soares should be removed.

  22. LOU

    HEY WALT – WHAT ARE YOU DOING? THAT WAS A LONG STORY YOU POSTED THERE:)

  23. Tim Hays

    Mister, we could use a man like Harry Truman or Jerry Ford again. . .

    our present political conflagration is going to turn our country into Gaza, or the Balkans, if we aren’t careful.

    All this hatred really began just 35 years ago, in 1973. It’s been tit-for-tat ever since; revenge by one party’s partisans against the other.

    Think of the theme of the “accidental presidency”: TR, Truman, Ford.

    I’m trying to not romanticize the past, but those three presidents were good for America.

    Looking at this statistically, and respecting the cycles of postwar American political history, in each year where in one party there has been a “bitter” presidential primary, the other party has won. 1956, 1964, 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1988, 1992, 2000. Add 2008 to that equation, I am certain.

    George Santayana, where are you today?

  24. ed

    Assailing the Alamo. Oh, you mean THAT Santayana.

Leave a Reply

About this blog
Politics on the Hudson, from The Journal News/LoHud.com, is your online source for up-to-the-minute political news, insight and dish in the Lower Hudson Valley and New York state. Contributors to the blog include reporters and editors from Westchester, Rockland and Putnam counties, as well as Albany and Washington.

Subscribe
Politics on the Hudson Podcast

Daily Blog Email Updates


The Authors


SMS Text Alerts
Want to be the first to learn about breaking local political news? Subscribe to the new text alerts from Politics on the Hudson.
Enter your phone number:
 
Advertisement
Other recent entries

Links



Recent Comments


Advertisement


Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives