<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Ugly Betty&#8221; returns</title>
	<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: WaltTrombone</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32332</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltTrombone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32332</guid>
		<description>Just using the numbers in the article. I also doubt that Ugly Betty would bring in $750M.

$30M in credits for one TV show seems excessive to me, too. Ms. Matthews, can we clarify this? Are they projecting $30M just for the one show, or for all potential film work?

At any rate, I'd rather see the work here than in California or Toronto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just using the numbers in the article. I also doubt that Ugly Betty would bring in $750M.</p>
<p>$30M in credits for one TV show seems excessive to me, too. Ms. Matthews, can we clarify this? Are they projecting $30M just for the one show, or for all potential film work?</p>
<p>At any rate, I&#8217;d rather see the work here than in California or Toronto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wahoo</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32328</link>
		<dc:creator>Wahoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32328</guid>
		<description>Walt, a show that probably will be taped on a soundstage in Astoria, Queens isn't going to bring in anywhere near the example you used in a "what if" manner.

As always, a big problem with NY is the unions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt, a show that probably will be taped on a soundstage in Astoria, Queens isn&#8217;t going to bring in anywhere near the example you used in a &#8220;what if&#8221; manner.</p>
<p>As always, a big problem with NY is the unions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara R</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32326</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32326</guid>
		<description>The blog is not about NYC, and the subject of this entry is pretty tangential to the Lower Hudson Valley. But that's par for the course on this blog, where the reporters routinely write about national politics while ignoring local races--except for the few that interest them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog is not about NYC, and the subject of this entry is pretty tangential to the Lower Hudson Valley. But that&#8217;s par for the course on this blog, where the reporters routinely write about national politics while ignoring local races&#8212;except for the few that interest them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaltTrombone</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32319</link>
		<dc:creator>WaltTrombone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32319</guid>
		<description>Tax credits that enable jobs to come to/remain in NY are relevant, whether it's for a factory or a TV show. It'd be nice to know how much $$ in business the Ugly Betty tax credits will generate, though. If the projected credits of $30M over three years can be offset by $750M of spending in NY by the film companies, that seems like a fair tradeoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax credits that enable jobs to come to/remain in NY are relevant, whether it&#8217;s for a factory or a TV show. It&#8217;d be nice to know how much $$ in business the Ugly Betty tax credits will generate, though. If the projected credits of $30M over three years can be offset by $750M of spending in NY by the film companies, that seems like a fair tradeoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32317</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32317</guid>
		<description>Explain, please.  This "costs"  the state 30 mil over three years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explain, please.  This &#8220;costs&#8221;  the state 30 mil over three years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara R</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32315</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/12/ugly-betty-returns/#comment-32315</guid>
		<description>This is really, really relevant to "Politics on the Hudson."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really, really relevant to &#8220;Politics on the Hudson.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
