Clinton’s victory speech
-
- May
- 13
Here is the transcript of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s victory speech in Charleston, W.Va. as provided by her campaign:
Thank you, West Virginia.
You know, like the song says: “it’s almost heaven,†and I am so grateful for this overwhelming vote of confidence.
There are some who have wanted to cut this race short. They say “give up, it’s too hard, the mountain is too high,†but here in West Virginia, you know a thing or two about rough roads to the top of the mountain. We know from the Bible that faith can move mountains and, my friends, the faith of the Mountain State has moved me. I am more determined than ever to carry on this campaign until everyone has had a chance to make their voices heard.
I want to commend Senator Obama and his supporters. This continues to be a hard-fought race, from one end of our country to the other. And yes, we’ve had a few dust-ups along the way, but our commitment to bring America new leadership that will renew America’s promise means that we have always stood together on what is most important.
Now, tonight I need your help to continue this journey. We are in the homestretch. There are only three weeks left in the final contests, and your support can make the difference between winning and losing. So I hope you’ll go to HillaryClinton.com and support our campaign.
You’ve heard this before – there are many who wanted to declare a nominee before the ballots were counted or even cast. Some said our campaign was over after Iowa, but then we won New Hampshire. Then we had big victories on Super Tuesday and in Ohio and Texas and Pennsylvania, and of course, we came from behind to win in Indiana.
So, this race isn’t over yet. Neither of us has the total delegates it takes to win and both Senator Obama and I believe that the delegates from Florida and Michigan should be seated. I believe we should honor the votes cast by 2.3 million people in those states and seat all of their delegates. Under the rules of our party, when you include all 50 states, the number of delegates needed to win is 2,209, and neither of us has reached that threshold yet. This win in West Virginia will help me move even closer.
Now, in a campaign, it can be easy to get lost in the political spin and the polls or the punditry, but we must never lose sight of what really counts, of why all of us care so much about who wins and who loses in our political system. An enormous decision falls on the shoulders of Democratic voters in these final contests and those Democrats empowered to vote at our convention. And tonight, in light of our overwhelming victory here in West Virginia, I want to send a message to everyone still making up their mind.
I am in this race because I believe I am the strongest candidate – the strongest candidate to lead our party in November of 2008 and the strongest president to lead our nation starting in January of 2009. I can win this nomination if you decide I should, and I can lead this party to victory in the general election if you lead me to victory now.
The choice falls to all of you, and I don’t envy you. I deeply admire Senator Obama, but I believe our case, a case West Virginia has helped to make, our case is stronger. Together, we have won millions and millions of votes – by the time tonight is over, probably 17 million, close to it. We’ve won them in states that we must be prepared and ready to win in November – Pennsylvania and Ohio, Arkansas and New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Michigan, Florida, and now West Virginia. It is a fact that no Democrat has won the White House since 1916 without winning West Virginia.
The bottom line is this – the White House is won in the swing states and I am winning the swing states. And we have done it by standing up for the deepest principles of our party with a vision for an America that rewards hard work again, that values the middle class and helps to make it stronger.
With your help, I am ready to go head-to-head with John McCain to put our vision for America up against the one he shares with President Bush. Now, I believe our party is strong enough for this challenge. I am strong enough for it. You know I never give up. I’ll keep coming back, and I’ll stand with you as long as you stand with me.
Together, we will draw the stark distinctions that will determine the future direction of our nation, the difference between ending the war in Iraq responsibly or continuing it indefinitely, between health care for everyone and more uninsured Americans, between standing up for the middle-class families that you represent or standing up for the corporate special interests.
So, I ask you, Democrats, to choose who you believe will make the strongest candidate in the fall and who is ready to execute the office of the presidency of the United States.
People ask me all the time, why am I in this race. Well, I’m in it because of the people that I have worked for my entire life and the people I meet along the campaign trail, people who need someone who fights for them because they’re fighting so hard every single day, the people who drive for miles to show their support, who come with the home-made sign, who raise money by skipping those dinners out, who have stood fast and stood strong. I’m in this race for the millions of Americans who know that we can do better in our country, for the nurse on her second shift, for the worker on the line, for the waitress on her feet, for the small business owner, the farmer, the teacher, the coal miner, the trucker, the soldier, the veteran, the college student.
All of the hardworking men and women who defy the odds to build a better life for themselves and their children. You will never be counted out, and I won’t either. You will never quit, and I won’t, either.
The question is, why do so many people keep voting? Why did 64 percent of Democrats say in a recent poll they wanted this race to continue? Because in the face of the pundits and the naysayers, they know what is at stake. They know that we have two wars, an economy in crisis on the brink of a recession, $9 trillion of debt, oil prices shooting through the roof, gas prices and grocery prices hurting people who desperately are looking for a way to just keep going day to day. They know they need a champion. They need someone who’s going to never stop fighting for health care that covers everyone, no exceptions, for an economy that lifts everyone up, for good jobs that won’t be shipped overseas, for college affordability, for all that you can do to own a home and then to keep it.
This election is fundamentally about whether or not the American dream remains alive and well, for our children and our grandchildren. This is the core of my life and my political beliefs: that we owe so much to future generations, that we do not want to see that dream recede, that we know people have to work hard, and we expect you to do just that and to take responsibility, but at the very least, you should have a President who is on your side again.
And I believe that this campaign has been good for the Democratic Party and good for our country. People are discussing and debating issues. They are turning out in record numbers to register and to vote. There is an excitement about politics that is the lifeblood of our democracy.
For me, this election isn’t about who’s in or who’s out or who’s up or who’s down. It’s about the common threads that tie us together – rich and poor, young and old, black and white, Latino and Asian, Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. We are united by common values. We all want a better world for our children, and we want the best for our country. And we are committed to putting a Democrat back in the White House.
And our nominee – our nominee will be stronger for having campaigned long and hard, building enthusiasm and excitement, hearing your stories and answering your questions. And I will work my heart out for the nominee of the Democratic Party to make sure we have a Democratic President.
As we look at the stakes in this election, I think we can all agree it’s been unprecedented. We haven’t had an election like it for as long as anyone can remember. It is still so close and it really does depend upon those who will vote in these next contests and those who have the awesome responsibility as delegates of our great Democratic Party.
I’m asking that people think hard about where we are in this election, about how we will win in November, because this is not an abstract exercise. This is for a solemn, crucial purpose: to elect a president to turn our country around, to meet the challenges we face and seize the opportunities. It has been a long campaign, but it is just an instant in time when compared with the lasting consequences of the choice we will make in November. That is why I am carrying on, and if you give me a chance, Democrats, I’ll come back to West Virginia in the general election and we’ll win this state and we’ll win the White House.
I am honored and grateful for the support and hospitality of the people of West Virginia. I spent a few minutes with your wonderful national treasure, Senator Byrd, this morning and we talked about his beloved West Virginia. I told him where I’d gone and what I’d seen. I talked about the people I had met. And he just broke into the biggest smile. I don’t know that any man has ever loved a state more than Robert C. Byrd loves West Virginia.
I am grateful for the graciousness of Governor and Mrs. Manchin. Governor Manchin is winning a great victory himself tonight, and I want to thank Joe and Gayle for welcoming me to Governor Manchin’s hometown as we went to Fairmont for a great election last night. I want to thank Senate Majority Leader Truman Chafin, former Governor Hulett Smith, Brigadier General Jack Yeager, all of the West Virginia veterans who honored me by their support and I honor their service.
Thanks to my friends in the labor unions who stood with us every step of the way, we wouldn’t be here without you. And a special thanks to my outstanding staff, volunteers and supporters here in West Virginia and across America.
At least once, usually a half a dozen times a day, Bill and Chelsea and I check in with each other and I wish every West Virginian could have heard our calls as we compared our experiences here in this state. We’ve had the best time.
And I will be back. As we move on now to the next contests, in Kentucky and Oregon, in Puerto Rico, in Montana and South Dakota, tonight I’m thinking about Florence Steen from South Dakota, eighty-eight years old and in failing health when she asked that her daughter bring an absentee ballot to her hospice bedside. Florence was born before women had the right to vote, and she was determined to exercise that right, to cast a ballot for her candidate who just happened to be a woman running for president. Florence passed on a few days ago, but I am eternally grateful to her and her family for making this such an important and incredible milestone in her life that means so much to me. I’m also thinking of Dalton Hatfield, an 11-year-old boy from Kentucky, who sold his bike and sold his video games to raise money to support my campaign.
This is a great and good nation because of people like Florence Steen, Dalton Hatfield, and their families. Her memory and his future are worth fighting for. As long as we remember that there is no challenge we cannot meet, no barrier we cannot break, no dream we cannot realize. So, let’s finish the job we started. America is worth fighting for.
Thank you and God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all so very much.










WHO CARES…THIS RACE IS OVER…IT IS NOW ALL ABOUT OBAMA vs MCCAIN!!!
She is making a fool of herself and is badly in need of counseling.
Wake up Dems…at this point the Clinton campaign has become a pyschotic ego trip and her bigoted comments last week about her support from “white voters” is nothing short of shameful. Had a Republican said what she did, the entire liberal establishment would be calling the candidate a racist.
2 in 10 west virginia democrats have said that race
was an “important factor” in voting for clinton
8 in 10 said race was a consideration….this does
not bode well for obama in the general…looking at
states like pa, mo, mich, ohio and florida…if the
democrats cannot win these they cannot win a
majority of electoral votes
And zero in ten answered that race does not enter into their decision-making? Unlikely.
As Hillary’s hatchet man Paul Begala said last week, Obama can’t win in November with his main support coming from a coalition of “eggheads and African-Americans.”
if it wasn’t for the fact that black voters monolithically
voted for Obama something lik 90-10..or if the democrats
did not have proportional delegates..clinton would have
been the nominee a long time ago..but remember in the
general election even if black voters vote 90% for
the democrat, the question becomes are there enough
new black and young voters to counter the problem
obama is having with white working class voters
making under 50,000 per year..
Hey Mike, you can’t point out that blacks vote for Obama monolithically. That’s “racist” talk, doncha know. Of course, its just fine to call white voters for Hillary (and ultimately, for McCain—just wait for it) “racist,” just like that low-grade political moron Matt Davies did in his scribble on the editorial page today.
just the facts “mam” just the facts..blacks have every right
to vote for barry ..they should be proud of him..however
blacks also vote for democrats as a general rule…not
quite 90-10 but around 80-20….I am betting that the
first black president will be a republican…who is
not particularly liberal…like say a colin powell for
example…but the big knock against obama is not that
he is black…its that he is the most liberal senator
in the congress..
Obama is the most liberal according to the National Review, so consider the source, Mike. This is the same National Review that said that John Kerry was the most liberal Senator back in ‘04.
Now, if you use the ratings from a liberal group, like Progressive Punch, the most liberal Senator for ‘07-08 is Frank Lautenberg. Kerry is #18, Clinton is #29, and Obama is #43. Even using lifetime ranking, Schumer is #15, Clinton is #17, Kerry is #26, and Obama is #24.
Yeah, sure, each side will rate who is more liberal or conservative according to their own pet issues. It’s just that I find it curious that, whoever happens to be the front-running Democrat, gets labeled the “most liberal.”
As Jake Tapper, ABC News points out, Obama was campaigning through much of 2007, and missed 32 of the 99 votes that the National Journal used to compile their rating. Of the remaining 65 votes that Obama and Clinton both voted on (they were both absent a lot, as was McCain, BTW), Obama voted identically to Clinton on 63 of those votes. Yet, inexplicably, Clinton is rated the 16th most liberal in the Senate for ‘07, while Obama is that #1 most liberal?
Anyone care to explain THAT methodology?
good point walt…but he is certainly one of the most
liberal senators….and by the time McCain’s media
guys get done he will be a John Kerry, Mike Dukakis
Teddy Kennedy kind of guy
BTW, according to Progressive Punch, John McCain is rated at #59 most liberal on his lifetime rating, but is at #89 for ‘07-08. Looks like he’s pandering to the far right to me. Flip-flop much?
Walt, you confused the National Journal with the National Review. The National Journal is non-partisan and highly respected. The National Review on the other hand is a conservative magazine that was founded by Bill Buckley and is known for partisanship.
The National Journal’s rankings tend to be pretty good. Kerry, was one of the most liberal Senators in the Senate. Was he more liberal than say Paul Wellstone? Probably not, but he wasn’t the moderate he was claiming to be either. Neither was Obama, who was very popular with the liberal wing of the Democratic Party in Illinois and was the liberal candidate in the 2004 Democratic Primary. I find it odd that you cite Progessive Punch, which no one has ever heard of as an authoritative source.
Unfortunately, I am not very impressed with McCain’s team and I suspect that Obama will get away with a lot of stuff, while Obama’s surrogates like Howard Dean attack McCain unfairly. McCain’s main media guy, Mark McKinnon, who worked for Democrats until switching to work G.W. may quit McCain’s campaign if Obama is the nominee, which appears very likely. McCain, needs his own Karl Rove.
Number 1, number 7, number 22. If one were to rate barbarians, one might rank Attila the Hun in front of Genghis Khan, but to what purpose? You still got yourself a pretty healthy barbarian. Reminds me of a cartoon I once saw with three grisly barbarian characters on horseback accompanied by a pipe-smoking, leather-elbowed sportcoat wearer, also on horseback. The caption? ‘Three barbarians and a professor of barbarian history.’
In 2006, both Obama and Clinton got a 95 (out of a perfect 100) “Liberal Quotient” from the Americans for Democratic Action, arguably the leading liberal lobbying group. ADA gave McCain a 15 that year.
The ADA’s counterpart is arguably the American Conservative Union. ACU gave Obama a conservative rating of 8.0 (out of 100) in 2006, and gives him a lifetime rating of 8.0. Clinton also got an 8.0 in 2006 and gets a whopping 9.0 lifetime. McCain got a score of 65 in 2006, and gets an 82.3 lifetime conservative rating.
And there you have it. Both the leading liberal and leading conservative rating groups give Obama and Clinton essentially equal marks, making them both indisputably ultra-liberals.
McCain appears from these ratings to be more conservative than conservatives claim he is, and less of a “maverick” than McCain says he is.
right on sara….the conservatives are never satisfied unless the republican candidate toes the mark perfectly
you have to hear sean hannity bitch about McCain and
climate change….thats why the registration figures
for republicans are in the tank..the right wing got
such a big head they thought that when they said jump
the republican candidate would say “”how high”...
but the election is in the middle..and as between
a center right candidate like McCain and a truly
far left of center candidate like Obama those middle
of the roaders and working class whites….as they
are affectionately called ..not to mention the jews
in palm beach county…..and the catholics in ohio
will pick McCain going away….Obama can have
the kids, the african american voters and the
chardonay drinkers….its not the coalition he needs
to win. He is missing the reagan democrats..big time
Conservatives have a perfect right to demand that Republicans remain faithful to the Republican party platform, which is inherently conservative. If a candidate or party member doesn’t like the platform, then change the platform or leave the party. But don’t call yourself a Republican, vote like that liberal clown Lincoln Chafee, and expect to be embraced by conservatives.
McCain, is actually a maverick, for better or worse. He diverges from party orthodoxy on: global warming, judges (to some extent), taxes, GITMO, patient bill of rights, guns (after the fall out between him and the NRA over McCain-Feingold) and campaign finance reform. A lot of issues don’t necessary come up for votes, so one gets the impression that he is more of a party loyalist than he really is. Social conservatives such as Rick Santorum claimed that McCain actively tried to prevent votes on certain social issues. McCain, almost switched parties in 2001.
In terms of McCain presidency, I suspect he will be relatively conservative on foreign policy, moderate on social issues, and economic issues it depends on whether his supply-side advisors or deficit hawk advisors win out. Right now, there is an ongoing battle between economic advisors such as Pete Peterson and Warren Ruddman and Jack Kemp and Phil Gramm.
But it is premature to even think that McCain will win. Obama, is narrowly beating him and his margin is likely to expand once the primary ends. The only silver lining for McCain is that Obama is not popular in Florida. Most analysts tend to give Obama a slight edge at this point.
And Sarah is correct about Chafee. Chafee, was not a moderate but reliably liberal Democrat who really did very little for Republicans. In his primary with Whitehouse, the candidates really only differed over party affiliation. There is clear distinction between a moderate Republican like Senator Spector and someone who does not support any of the Republican agenda like Chafee. I blame Dole for wasting money on his race. Chafee, repaid the favor by leaving the Republican party and endorsing Obama.
McCain is the best hope for Republicans right now but even for him, he has a tough road ahead.
its McCain or the democrat…conservative othodoxy really
doesn’t matter in this election…if conservatives stay
home they deserve what they get