Comments on: Working Families Party Makes 143 State Endorsements

By: 7Curses

7Curses — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:37:05 +0000

some yokels are still living with the “fear”. probably watch reruns of hearings held by the house committee on un-american activities

By: Wahoo

Wahoo — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:02:06 +0000

Let’s guess. With Lou’s kudos above about the WF Party, it’s probably so that those Marxists endorsed the unprincipled and talent devoid flip-flopper Mike Spano.

By: Tim Hays

Tim Hays — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:02:53 +0000

Follow the money, quid Watergate.

By: LOU

LOU — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:30:45 +0000

THE WFP GOT MOST OF THIER ENDORSEMENTS RIGHT. GOOD JOB GUYS

By: Wahoo

Wahoo — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:53:28 +0000

That’s about the only difference. They are Communists in a Working Families disguise.

By: ed

ed — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:58:05 +0000

What’s the major difference- that they all don’t live in the same house and share toilets?

By: the consultant

the consultant — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:27:13 +0000

they are unionists…communists not…socialists yet
ie centralized goverment control of the means of produciton
and redistribution of wealth from me to them….
but I doubt they are for totalitarianism…
However whether it is the working families, IND or CONSV
parties..they are corrupting the process…because they
are interested in what they can extract from the major
party candidates….either ideologically or in other
ways….

By: Wahoo

Wahoo — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:05:44 +0000

Agreed. But the Working Families Party? It’s just a modern name for the old Communnist Party, isn’t it?

By: the consultant

the consultant — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:35:11 +0000

why should a special interest third party like the
working families party be able to cross endorse a major
party candidate…that allows for too much leverage to
the minor party..leverage to extract promises or jobs
only four other states permit this practice….new york
needs to pass legislation to prevent cross endorsements