Comments on: Bruno: Spitzer Was “Demented”

By: MBrown

MBrown — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:46:28 +0000

Re Tim Hays
Are you a practicing psychologist or just someone with limited knowledge? As for his physical attributes, I have to ask how you know???? Hmmmm…. Anyway most of the narcissistic tendencies apply to all politicians and anyone who thinks that they don’t apply to Joe Bruno or George Pataki is seriously in denial. Perhaps people should revisit the video of Joe Bruno screaming at the Times Union reporter who asked him a question at a press conference? Not pretty. Finally, it should be pointed out that in politics as in life you will find good, bad and ugly and it is pretty much across the spectrum!

By: Tim Hays

Tim Hays — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:33:39 +0000

I think you’ll find an explication of our immediate past governor somewhere in DSM V.

A tiny johnson, ugly looks, rich parents, arrogance beyond belief. A spoiled little puke of a person. Half a man. His children should change their names. Not a good guy.

Then: go get everybody who supported him, in 2006. You’ll find similar characteristics about them (small endowments, most prominent). Corrupt, horrible Democrats. The inneffectual, impotent folks who live among us. The Democrats today in Westchester are very much like the mad zombies in the horror flick “28 Weeks.”

Send the former governor away, now. Route 81, in Pennsylvania. Two plush penitentiaries await him there.

By: yabbi

yabbi — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:34:10 +0000

It takes a narcissist to run for office, and there’s a fine line between narcissism and paranoia. What do we expect? We should anticipate that change over, and not be surprised. There should be a ‘gauge’ in place, like those red pop-up turkey roasting timers, that tells us ‘this pol is done’, so we can pull them out of office, and replace them with the next idiot. It’s just a matter of time in most cases.

By: ed1

ed1 — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:04:00 +0000

Cuomo as I recall, decided him innocent. Problem is, and it applies to all of them, they have a system in place that effectively says that so long as they have any minimal visitation that might be construed as State business, (talking to the Mayor or any other various pols), the whole trip is valid even though the bulk of the time was taken up by personal business or pleasure. It’s a major loophole they engineered for themselves, and it’s virtually impossible to police.

By: Real Deal

Real Deal — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:53:09 +0000

But let’s bring the whole Trooper gate thing back to its genesis:

What exactly WAS Bruno doing on these trips? Was he using state assets for personal +/or political purposes?

Have those questions ever been answered to the full extent?

By: ed1

ed1 — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:16:41 +0000

I wouldn’t touch that line with a red- hot poker.

By: Wahoo

Wahoo — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:08:11 +0000

Bruno in his own way is as bad as Spitzer. Both are big hypocrites, too. The are standard pols in that regard.

Is Spitzer demented? Only his hookers know for sure. When he says, “Let me go into the kitchen and whip up something,” what does he really mean?

I hope no one here can truly answer that question. But the odds are someone will try to be creative.

Is it Reddi Whip, or “Ready? WHIP!”

By: ed1

ed1 — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:38:47 +0000

The most telling part of this article is where Bruno says he got along fine with Spitzer while Eliot was Attorney General. When the Spitzer was bulldozing, maligning, threatening, and railroading those other than Bruno, himself, everything was hunky-dory.

By: the consultant

the consultant — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:36:17 +0000

there seems to be listen question that elliot has some
issues…to patronize a prostitution ring while you
are engaged in proscuting those kinds of acts is self
destructive at the very least..and would seem to
indicate a deep psycholigcal problem..hopefully he
is getting professional help