lohud.com

Sponsored by:

No need for lieutenant governor’s office

August
7

With David Paterson’s elevation to governor, his old lieutenant’s post has been slashed from the state budget. The position won’t be replaced until the November 2010 election, Assemblyman George Latimer tells us.  That means there’s no need to fund that office and its $1.37 million expense, Latimer says. It won’t be funded next year, either. Staffers there are to be reassigned to other state vacancies, Latimer says.   

This entry was posted on Thursday, August 7th, 2008 at 11:57 am by Gerald McKinstry.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Share and Enjoy: del.icio.us Digg Furl Reddit Google StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! | Print This | Email This Email This

Advertisement

7 Responses to “No need for lieutenant governor’s office”

  1. JOHN

    How come it has taken so long for this happen?

    What has the staff

    been doing since we have not had a Lieutenant Governnor?

  2. From Westchester

    Is anyone surprised that A) there is no reason to have a Lieutenant Governor and B) that Assemblyman Latimer should recognize this, because C) he lusted after the job?

  3. ed1

    “And in order to be sure not to turn this saved money back to the financially imploding state, we are reassigning staffers to other paper-shuffling activities. Thank you for your money and attention, and good night.”

  4. Mary

    What has the staff been doing since Patterson has been the Governor?

  5. Paul

    They are all political hacks and it must change.

  6. Tim Hays

    The office of Lieutenant Governor should indeed be abolished.

    Just ask Stan Lundine or Al DelBello.

    The last worthwhile Lt. Gov. was Malcolm Wilson.

    We save a million here, a million there, and pretty soon you’ve got a budget in-line with the people’s wants. In New York, we never want to get to the “Ev Dirksen” tipping point (“a billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you’re talking about real money.”)

  7. WaltTrombone

    You mean we’re not there already, Tim?

    Getting rid of the Lt. Gov position probably isn’t as easy as just stop funding it. There’s probably something in the State Constitution about a line of succession, in case the Governor can’t do that Governing thing. It seems that we have no requirement to actually replace a Lt. Gov who gets moved up, so it’s entirely appropriate to stop funding the office in the interim. I’d bet it would take an amendment to the Constitution to eliminate the post entirely, though. Perhaps it could be changed so that the State Comptroller, or AG would be next in line, and then you’d have an actual job to do while waiting for the next scandal to bring down the Governor.

    ;-)

Leave a Reply

About this blog
Politics on the Hudson, from The Journal News/LoHud.com, is your online source for up-to-the-minute political news, insight and dish in the Lower Hudson Valley and New York state. Contributors to the blog include reporters and editors from Westchester, Rockland and Putnam counties, as well as Albany and Washington.

Subscribe
Politics on the Hudson Podcast

Daily Blog Email Updates


The Authors


SMS Text Alerts
ÒWant to be the first to learn about breaking local political news? Subscribe to the new text alerts from Politics on the Hudson.Ó
Enter your phone number:
 
Advertisement
Other recent entries

Links



Recent Comments


Advertisement


Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives