<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABC: Edwards admits affair, denies love child</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/08/08/abc-edwards-admits-affair-denies-love-child/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/08/08/abc-edwards-admits-affair-denies-love-child/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:00:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jiminy Cricket</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/08/08/abc-edwards-admits-affair-denies-love-child/comment-page-1/#comment-36615</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiminy Cricket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/08/08/abc-edwards-admits-affair-denies-love-child/#comment-36615</guid>
		<description>Wanna bet that Edwards is still lying about the child?  As a lawyer, lying is second nature to him, and so are the words &quot;deny, deny deny.&quot;  It&#039;s time for a DNA test.

Nice guy, cheating on his cancer-stricken wife who had traveled all over to help him run for president.

This story was being talked about for months on the internet but only in a few newspapers. The so-called &quot;mainstream&quot; media tried to ignore it.  BIAS.  

The NY Times had no problem smearing John McCain with a front page story hinting of an affair, but without a shred of evidence.  They had to retract it. At the very same time, Edwards was still a presidential candidate.  The Times knew of the Enquirer&#039;s early work on this matter, but ignored it. BIAS.  The Times wasn&#039;t alone -- right Gannett, ABC, NBC, CBS, and many other newspapers?

But kudos to the National Enquirer for keeping up the work while the others chose to look anywhere except at Edwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanna bet that Edwards is still lying about the child?  As a lawyer, lying is second nature to him, and so are the words &#8220;deny, deny deny.&#8221;  It&#8217;s time for a DNA test.</p>
<p>Nice guy, cheating on his cancer-stricken wife who had traveled all over to help him run for president.</p>
<p>This story was being talked about for months on the internet but only in a few newspapers. The so-called &#8220;mainstream&#8221; media tried to ignore it.  BIAS.  </p>
<p>The NY Times had no problem smearing John McCain with a front page story hinting of an affair, but without a shred of evidence.  They had to retract it. At the very same time, Edwards was still a presidential candidate.  The Times knew of the Enquirer&#8217;s early work on this matter, but ignored it. BIAS.  The Times wasn&#8217;t alone&#8212;right Gannett, ABC, NBC, CBS, and many other newspapers?</p>
<p>But kudos to the National Enquirer for keeping up the work while the others chose to look anywhere except at Edwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed1</title>
		<link>http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/08/08/abc-edwards-admits-affair-denies-love-child/comment-page-1/#comment-36611</link>
		<dc:creator>ed1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/08/08/abc-edwards-admits-affair-denies-love-child/#comment-36611</guid>
		<description>Confucius say:  Always advisable to question the ethics and intentions of any man with a $200 haircut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confucius say:  Always advisable to question the ethics and intentions of any man with a $200 haircut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
