lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Paterson: Don’t Make Senate Race A Spectacle

January
9

Governor Paterson continued his round of interviews following his State of the State Address, appearing this morning on Fox 5’s “Good Day New York” in New York City.

When asked if the Senate race to replace Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is becoming a spectacle, Paterson shot back, “I’m not making it the spectacle. So don’t make it the spectacle and ask me to solve your problems.”

When questioned that he must have a gut feeling on who he is going to pick, Paterson said “I’ve refrained from having a gut feeling because I haven’t interviewed all the candidates.”

He continued the same theme as yesterday that Caroline Kennedy, like the other candidates, have their strengthens and weaknesses. And he downplayed Kennedy’s poor rollout.

“I am going to sit down and talk to her and make my decision based on that,” he said. “I could see that a person who wasn’t in public service could have a little stage fright and would be struggling a little bit, having media interviews.

“Some of us have been here 20 years struggle with the media. So the issue is that all the candidates in the race – and by the way there are other candidates in the race if you’re following along – they have their relative strengthens and areas where they aren’t so strong.”

Paterson went on to point out that whoever he picks, the public will get to vote on his decision in 2010, saying that of the last 38 senators to be appointed by governors, 18 won and 20 lost.

“In the end, the public will make the final decision,” he said.

This entry was posted on Friday, January 9th, 2009 at 10:54 am by Joseph Spector.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Print This | Email This Email This

Advertisement

5 Responses to “Paterson: Don’t Make Senate Race A Spectacle”

  1. elizabeth bauersox

    Perhaps Paterson is wondering—as a few of us are—whether Caroline shares part of the blame for the careless vetting that was done of Richardson.

    Caroline was supposedly in charge of the committee that researched VP possibilities, which included Richardson.

    A thorough vetting would have turned up the conflict of interest that has caused embarrasment to both Obama and Richardson.

  2. ed1

    Curious to ponder what, if anything, Obama’s people offered Richardson for his startling endorsement and his total abandonment of the Clintons, who were long his benefactors.

  3. dp

    David Paterson, Caroline Kennedy…what’s the future of our state?

  4. CHOICES

    Will Caroline Kennedy be the best choice? With the difficult economic times we are all experiencing in NY and across the country, why the person with the big name? Will she truly fight for NYers??

    On another note, when she speaks candidly, she is a horrible speaker unless her speech is written and memorized. Every other word is ‘you know.’ It was sad to listen to a well education person speak candidly so poorly.

    Let’s hope the Paterson chooses wisely for this important job.

  5. the consultant

    The selection of a senator to succeed hillary is ipso
    facto a polititcal spectacle..apparently david
    doens’t have the political chops to deal with it

Leave a Reply

Advertisement
About this blog
Politics on the Hudson, from The Journal News/LoHud.com, is your online source for up-to-the-minute political news, insight and dish in the Lower Hudson Valley and New York state. Contributors to the blog include reporters and editors from Westchester, Rockland and Putnam counties, as well as Albany and Washington.

Subscribe
Politics on the Hudson Podcast

Daily Blog Email Updates


The Authors


Local Elections

Elections Central 2009

SMS Text Alerts
Want to be the first to learn about breaking local political news? Subscribe to the new text alerts from Politics on the Hudson.
Enter your phone number:
 
Advertisement
Other recent entries

Links



Recent Comments


Advertisement


Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives


Bad Behavior has blocked 4357 access attempts in the last 7 days.