1.help police investigate illegal firearms,
2prohibit felons from buying guns,
3require child-proof devices on guns, and \
4. banning advanced firearms and ammunition used to kill police officers, according to the Assembly.
5.require that semiautomatic pistols manufactured or delivered to any licensed dealer in New York be capable of microstamping ammunition. Microstamping means information that identifies the make, model and serial number of a gun is “stamped” onto a cartridge as the weapon is fired.

YOU CAN’T POSSILBY OBJECT TO THE ABOVE …THE POLICE
SUPPORT IT…..AND IT HAS NO EFFECT ON OWNERSHIP OF
WEAPONS BY NEW YORKERS WHO WANT A GUN

If we’re afraid of anything, it’s you right-wing nuts, who love guns, who want to dictate religion to us, who don’t want reasonable programs to help people, and who angry, hugely angry about everything. I saw people having Tea Party in Texas and Alaska, where they have the most conservative state governments anywhere, and they’re anti-govt. The Texas Gov. talks about secession (I bet he didn’t talk that when the two Texas Bushes were in the White House).

Rightists and Leftists both have their intesne ideology-first attitudes. But the Hard Left is pretty weak and small nationwide…this ain’t 1968 anymore. But the Right-Wing has gotten huge, owning Fox News and talk radio…and it’s no wonder that the folks in the middle 20% of the nation are embracing Democrats, for all their failures, in recent elections.

Democrats, Independents and Moderate Republicans – even traditional Conservatives – fear the new-Right and their angry orthodoxy. That’s where Nazi America will spring from.

On another note, my son has a black-belt, knows how to disarm/use a dagger, how to use a sword, and how to shoot a rifle(might be a shot-gun – he’s taking his SATs as I write) and I am thrilled that he has the basic knowledge on how to use these weapons.

Bottom-line the laws on the books here in NY aren’t helping its citizens, only hindering them. When criminals have no fear of going into a home to rob it then we are the hunted. I can’t tell you how violated I felt when someone tried to walk into my house-”I need directions” but he didn’t knock or ring the bell, he tried to walk right in. He had no fear of what he might encounter.

If you have to worry about getting your head shot off before you enter someone’s home – that’s a risk I’d like to take, rather than having criminals feeling free to attack us simply because they are certain we don’t have the knowledge or weapons to fight back.

More guns on the streets the less the crime rate will be.

Look at the counties throughout the United States that have a high percentage of guns. In these counties you have less crime.

True this is not Germany, but you never know what the future is.

“you can bet if the founders were around and saw the number of guns proliferating as well as the assault weapons they would have made it abundantly clear in the language of the amendment that it was only in connection with a standing militia that the right to bear arms pertains..”

Not at all. They intended that the citizens, of which the militia was composed, be enabled to keep their military arms in order to bear them upon call, and in their own defense when necessary.

You really need to study the writings of the Founders more closely, consultant.

“that is what they were saying in the context of the times”

The individual liberty s enumerated in the Bill of Rights are certainly not confined to or limited by ‘the times’-if that was the case we would not be enjoying our First Amendment rights by posting our opinions on an electronic medium.

dDenying us our Second Amendment rights is your intent, consultant. The politics are just incidental.

Everyone should remember that after Registration comes Confiscation.Look back in History Nazi Germany, USSR, England,Australia any communist country.See where Gun control got them.Notice that People of England Australia are called SUBJECT not CITIZEN. All should remeber that another and probably the main reason our founding Fathers inserted the 2nd Amend was to protect the Citizens of our Country from the take over by a Tyranical Govt. What the Govt is trying to do know is in line with what our founding fathers were looking to protect us from. Losing our rights 1 bye 1.

The 2nd Amendmant makes all others Possible !!!

1) History is the best tool for understanding political intentions as well as the benefits, but most importantly the consequences of policies.

2) History has always and will always repeat itself, UNLESS the PEOPLE (NOT THE GOVERNMENT) take responsibility for guiding and governing their own future… by taking responsibility in making sure that they encourage and inspire their children to be successful and eager to learn new things always, encouraging a strong work ethic, (give the kid some age-respecting chores) and for god sakes don’t be afraid punish them when they do something wrong.

3) The competent man learns from his own mistakes. The wise man learns from the mistakes of others.

THE FOUNDING FATHERS WERE VERY WISE PEOPLE WHO UNDERSTOOD FIRST HAND WHAT HUMAN RIGHTS ARE NECESSARY FOR, AS WELL AS WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A FREE STATE TO EXIST AS JUST THAT…FREE.

-These words are not to provoke fear anger or hatred, but to promote education, a personal resistance to conform (to not believe what you hear but to understand it and use your own research, self-education, and sound judgment), as well as a personal responsibility of ones own decisions, and responsibility of the community to serve and uphold the very basis of which this nation (of the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE and for the PEOPLE) was founded on. The time and date may change the countries circumstances may become different, but it does not change the fact that the people of this country share a responsibility to continue its greatness, I suggest turning off the TV for a couple hours a day and learn how to do something useful, not only will you become more experienced in whatever you choose too understand but you may learn something for yourself in the process.

No one said anything of the kind, and yes it is totally illogical, as is your nonsensical discussion of the 2nd Amendment, which, again, no one has brought up but you. Look at your language: Law Enforcement is “entitled”? Have you heard of “Heller”? The Bill of Rights?

The Constitution is about “Inalienable Rights”, not rights that the goverment, comprised of human beings, can give and take at will, like some fickle tyrant. That is why Obama doesn’t like it, since it delineates “negative rights” to the government. Obama, being a Saul Alinsky trained Marxist, detests the Constitution.

And, in many states, usually the ones with the lowest violent crime statistics, you CAN get an Uzi or an AK, and in some states, they can actually be fully automatic! These weapons are owned by law abiding citizens and are not “on the street” and do not contribute to crime. And the only people who see them as a bigger threat than the guns in the hands of criminals are Democrats.