Comments on: Legislation Would Make Public Lawmakers’ Defense Funds http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2009/11/05/legislation-would-make-public-lawmakers-defense-funds/ Political news in the Lower Hudson Valley, New York state. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Habib Hasan - An American Storyteller http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2009/11/05/legislation-would-make-public-lawmakers-defense-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-48420 Habib Hasan - An American Storyteller Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:59:47 +0000 http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/?p=12389#comment-48420 The "Poor People of The United States of America" cannot afford any legal representation at all. And, if the Political Establishments think that : "Well!, but we have legal aid . . " What legal aid is that which facilitiate only a few particular ethnicities right in the open who only beleieve in a few topics of American History and consider them even after 1968 that "they are the victims" - Distorting the facts - teaching the young ones they "we" sufferred. The Students know are taught that "The Founding Fathers had Slaves" but at the same time the same educational institutions are failing to also teach the young ones that "The Founding Fathers also freeed thier Slaves in their last Wills" . . . . Now, reading that the "socalled" Lawmakes creating a "defense fund" Can you believe it! The question that coomes to my mind is that why would a "LAWMAKER" [after commiting a crime] need a "DEFENCE FUND" In the opinion of this writer a "so-called type" of LAWMAKER should first of all does not even deserve to be a "LAWMAKER" . . .Who is kidding who or All are engaged in kidding The Republic - Let "We the People decide that part" . . I think the answer would be found more convienently by everone by standing alone in front of a mirror for finding the true answer - Accountablity should first start form selfexamination of one's own soul and face value first. By just getting elected [anyways] in the House of Representatives or State or Local Legislature does not qualify one to be what the defination of a "LAWMAKER" is . . . What matters is that not even the "conscience of one's charecter" but more is the end results and his reflection to the Loyalties to The Republic as a whole - Not having one foot in the United States and the other in [the backhome-Country of Origin] and [not] very fortunately having a "right to vote" in shaping the destiny of Our Great Nation. Is that fair? We as a Nation have to really focus on Our National Interests being represented where The United States is always going to be at the Driver Seat and not to become Passengers on the next seat or the back seat - This is what The Checks and Balances demand under The Rule of Law under The Supreme Law of The Land - Nobody can be allowed to makes any Laws contrary to what the Constitution permit - and it's every American's responsiblity. Habib Hasan - An American Storyteller The “Poor People of The United States of America” cannot afford any legal representation at all. And, if the Political Establishments think that : “Well!, but we have legal aid . . ” What legal aid is that which facilitiate only a few particular ethnicities right in the open who only beleieve in a few topics of American History and consider them even after 1968 that “they are the victims” – Distorting the facts – teaching the young ones they “we” sufferred. The Students know are taught that “The Founding Fathers had Slaves” but at the same time the same educational institutions are failing to also teach the young ones that “The Founding Fathers also freeed thier Slaves in their last Wills” . . . .

Now, reading that the “socalled” Lawmakes creating a “defense fund” Can you believe it!

The question that coomes to my mind is that why would a “LAWMAKER” [after commiting a crime] need a “DEFENCE FUND”
In the opinion of this writer a “so-called type” of LAWMAKER should first of all does not even deserve to be a “LAWMAKER” . . .Who is kidding who or All are engaged in kidding The Republic – Let “We the People decide that part” . . I think the answer would be found more convienently by everone by standing alone in front of a mirror for finding the true answer – Accountablity should first start form selfexamination of one’s own soul and face value first.

By just getting elected [anyways] in the House of Representatives or State or Local Legislature does not qualify one to be what the defination of a “LAWMAKER” is . . .

What matters is that not even the “conscience of one’s charecter” but more is the end results and his reflection to the Loyalties to The Republic as a whole – Not having one foot in the United States and the other in [the backhome-Country of Origin] and [not] very fortunately having a “right to vote” in shaping the destiny of Our Great Nation. Is that fair?

We as a Nation have to really focus on Our National Interests being represented where The United States is always going to be at the Driver Seat and not to become Passengers on the next seat or the back seat –
This is what The Checks and Balances demand under The Rule of Law under The Supreme Law of The Land –

Nobody can be allowed to makes any Laws contrary to what the Constitution permit – and it’s every American’s responsiblity.

Habib Hasan – An American Storyteller

]]> By: VJ Machiavelli http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2009/11/05/legislation-would-make-public-lawmakers-defense-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-48406 VJ Machiavelli Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:35:26 +0000 http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/?p=12389#comment-48406 You cannot legislate HONESTY either you have or you don't. This also goes for the "PRESS', they seem to play both sides. One day they are reporting about X the next day they are working for X Take Errol Cockfield former Albany bureau chief for Newsday in 2006 he was reporting on Spitzer vs Faso, in Jan 2007 he has working for the Spitzer administration, at a very big salary increase. He is not the first or will be the LAST, the question is are they giving "HONEST SERVICE" to the readers of the papers they work for etc etc ?? The whole system needs a dose of HONESTY. VJ Machiavelli No More Schumer No More Pelosi No More Rangel No More Engel and his Million Dollar Home in Maryland, and No More Arthur Finkelstein & co You cannot legislate HONESTY either you have or you don’t.

This also goes for the “PRESS’, they seem to play both sides.

One day they are reporting about X the next day they are working for X

Take Errol Cockfield former Albany bureau chief for Newsday in 2006 he was reporting on Spitzer vs Faso, in Jan 2007 he has working for the Spitzer administration, at a very big salary increase.

He is not the first or will be the LAST, the question is are they giving “HONEST SERVICE” to the readers of the papers they work for etc etc ??

The whole system needs a dose of HONESTY.

VJ Machiavelli

No More Schumer
No More Pelosi
No More Rangel
No More Engel and his Million Dollar Home in Maryland, and
No More Arthur Finkelstein & co

]]>